— Use case · Datasets

Structured datasets at scrape cost.

Define a complex schema once. An agent learns each website at design time and writes typed extraction stages; A3 then replays them at scale with no LLM in the loop — so cost stays close to raw scraping, not agentic re-parsing on every row.

"The Seated Scribe" — records, written down.
— The agentic trap

Other platforms call the LLM on every scrape.

You need highly structured rows from dozens or hundreds of websites — nested fields, normalisation, provenance. Agentic extraction that re-reasons over every page works for a demo; at daily refreshes across a whole source list, model cost and latency take over.

Why agentic scraping doesn't scale

Per-page LLM calls add up fast. Complex schemas make each invocation heavier — and you still need a separate integration per site, with no guarantee rows match your warehouse shape.

How A3 keeps cost down

Intelligence stays in the learning phase. The agent visits each source once, writes stages against your schema, and hands off to a deterministic runner — locally or in the cloud — that extracts without a model in the loop.

Agentic platforms

LLM on every row — agentic platforms re-parse each page at collection time; cost scales linearly with volume.

With A3

LLM at design time — the agent learns each source once; production runs replay compiled stages with zero model spend.

Agentic platforms

Flat, inconsistent output — free-form extraction returns a different shape per site; normalisation is a second project.

With A3

Complex typed schemas — define nested records once; every site maps into the same validated output, automatically.

Agentic platforms

Manual per-site work — engineers hand-write scrapers or prompt-tune each source; onboarding a new site is slow.

With A3

Agent learns each site — point A3 at a URL, describe the schema, and it writes stages and a playbook for that source.

Agentic platforms

Hard to fan out — running thousands of extractions daily across many domains is ops-heavy and expensive.

With A3

Scale without token cost — schedule and fan out collection with configurable concurrency; extraction cost stays at runner rates, not token rates.

Agentic platforms

Sites drift — a redesign breaks extraction; agentic re-prompting on every failure is slow and still costly.

With A3

Self-healing stages — when a page stops matching, the learning agent auto-fixes the stage in real time; the runner keeps collecting.

— Common concerns

Rich schemas across many sites — without agentic pricing.

Data teams need structure and scale, not another platform that bills per page. A3 separates design-time learning from production extraction — so you get agent-quality dataset builds at a cost profile closer to traditional scraping.

— Structure

Complex schemas, many websites, one shape

Define nested, typed records once — then onboard site after site into the same output. The agent learns each source automatically; the runner validates every row against your schema before it lands in the dataset.

— Cost

Intelligence at design time, not per row

Other agentic platforms call the model on every extraction. A3 uses the agent once to learn each site; production runs are deterministic Playwright stages with no LLM spend — so refreshing a million rows costs runner time, not tokens.

— Scale

Thousands of runs at scale

Fan out across sites and input fixtures with configurable concurrency. Schedule daily refreshes, collect artifacts, and wire outputs into your warehouse — all without a model in the loop at runtime.

— Reliability

Self-healing when sources drift

A redesign should not halt collection or force you back to per-page prompting. When a stage stops matching, the learning agent auto-fixes it in real time — so scheduled runs keep producing validated rows.

— Across sources

The same model for every dataset.

Real estate, retail, travel, and firmographics look different on the surface — but you define one schema and onboard source after source. A3 learns each site's collection path once, then replays it on a schedule at scrape-scale cost.

— Real estate

Listings from search to detail

Property portals paginate results, hide full attributes on detail pages, and change layout frequently. Teams need every field — price, beds, tenure, agent — not just what appears on the card.

  • Why collect — power comparables, market analytics, and lead gen without manual exports or fragile scrapers per portal.
  • Detail drill-down — stages open each listing before output so attributes only visible on the detail page are captured.
  • Stable ids — dedupe by listing id and canonical URL so refreshes merge cleanly.
  • Media metadata — capture image counts and floorplan links alongside core fields.
— Retail

Catalogues and live pricing

Retail sites span categories, variants, and promotional pricing — often spread across paginated grids and product pages that change with seasons and campaigns.

  • Why collect — track competitor pricing, assortment changes, and stock status across many storefronts.
  • Variant complexity — size, colour, and bundle rules require detail-page extraction, not grid summaries alone.
  • Promos and strikethrough — capture current vs. was prices and offer badges as structured fields.
  • Category pagination — stages for grid, next page, and product detail compose into a full catalogue pass.
— Hotel rates

Every bookable room-rate combination

Rate shopping means querying many properties across date ranges — with board basis, cancellation terms, and taxes often split between API payloads and the DOM.

  • Why collect — feed rate intelligence, parity monitoring, and revenue tools with fresh, comparable rows.
  • Payload first — read search and availability JSON from network traffic when the booking engine exposes it.
  • Policy fields — board basis, cancellation windows, and fees normalised into the same schema per property.
  • Date-range inputs — parameterise check-in, stay length, and occupancy from fixtures; fan out at scale.
— Other

Firmographics and beyond

Company registries, directories, job boards, and niche catalogues — any source where records live on the public web and need to land in a typed schema on a schedule.

  • Why collect — enrich CRM, build market maps, and monitor public records without bespoke integrations per source.
  • Registration data — officers, addresses, sectors, and status fields from registries and directories.
  • Search + filter flows — many sources require query forms and faceted results before records appear.
  • Same pipeline — one workflow model per source; learn once, schedule collection, validate every row.
— Build your first dataset

Design with an agent. Extract at scrape cost.

Define your schema and learn each source in the Product ADE, then schedule collection at scale — structured rows from hundreds of sites, without paying model tokens on every refresh.

See the product →